I am seeing a lot of action on the Design Professional Service Corporation (DPC) front. The DPC is the only entity in which New York permits non-licensed owners of architecture, engineering and other design professional firms. With most other states permitting some form of non-licensed ownership of design professional firms, New York was a bit late to the party but the DPC became a permitted entity effective January 1, 2012. As Jay Simson, President of ACEC New York, remarked at the time, "Thank you Governor Cuomo, I think the design professionals began lobbying for this when your father was Governor."
In essence, up to 24.99% of the outstanding shares of a DPC may be issued to non-licensed professionals, and director and officer positions up to that same percentage may be held by non-licensed professionals, although the Chairperson of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer positions must be held by licensed design professionals. The DPC form offers design professional firms greater flexibility in terms of attracting and rewarding business specialists such as financial, marketing and technology professionals who may not be licensed design professionals.
At first, taking advantage of the DPC form presented a series of difficulties for existing design professional firms. While an existing firm could organize an entirely new DPC entity and dissolve the existing entity, this could create tax and business issues. For example, all of the old firm's contracts (from leases to client contracts) would have to be assigned to the new entity, a lot of work and getting the consents to contract assignments never a given. A workaround was to keep the old firm in existence and concurrently start up a new DPC that would take on new business and, ultimately, the business' obligations. However, since both the NYS Department of State and the State Education Department do not permit two separate entities to have confusingly similar names, either the old or the new firm would have to essentially rebrand, also not an appealing outcome for many firms.
In 2013, the law was augmented so that existing professional corporations (PCs) can simply convert into a DPC, thereby eliminating, the tax, contract and name issues for that large group of firms. The other permitted types of firms, limited liability partnerships and professional service limited liability companies, do not have such conversion rights presently.
In light of the law change, the increased DPC activity makes sense. Those that are starting new firms are electing the DPC for its relatively low start-up costs and the knowledge that they have flexibility when the day comes to bring non-licensed professionals into the firm’s management and ownership ranks. Now the PCs also have an easy way to walk through the DPC door. Allowing non-licensed individuals to hold ownership, officer and director positions in design professional firms truly allows firms to focus without restraint on the most qualified candidates for certain business-related positions. Congratulations to all of you who are taking advantage!
The Benefit Corporation is considered a hybrid of a for-profit corporation and a not-for-profit in that the directors do not run the corporation solely to maximize corporate value for its shareholders.
Design professionals all over the world have taken to heart the words famously crooned by Frank Sinatra, "I want to be a part of it, New York, New York."
Starting a business and forming an entity are two different things.
A gratifying part of my business is helping design professionals start their own practices. I usually have a gut feeling about who is going to make it, and who may decide that being an employee wasn’t so bad after all.
Architects and their practices are highly regulated because of their charge to safeguard life, health, property and the public welfare.
Many of my clients and potential clients are in the process of setting up their own design firms.
Starting an architectural firm is a big decision. One of the next big decisions for the architectural entrepreneur is deciding what form of business entity will be appropriate for your current practice as well as your future practice.
When a client comes to us to form a New York business, the first step we take is to evaluate the proposed name of the entity.